Thursday, September 4, 2025

AI: IB vs AP

 



No, my title isn’t in code. It’s a response to last week’s Boston Globe article by Simon Rabinovitch about the use of artificial intelligence in education.

          I know I’ve written about this before, but what I see for the future still bothers me. As teacher, I spent a hefty amount of time trying to get my students to use their brains and as an English teacher, their own words. I can’t even imagine how frustrating this task must be now, with chatbots like ChatGpt and Claude available to assemble the words for them.

          I often taught honors classes, and in my later teaching years in the International Baccalaureate Programme. One of my students' assignments was to write a simple summary paragraph about a particular piece of literature. One girl, rather than do it herself, copied something word-for-word from online and submitted it as her own.

          Of course, the vocabulary and style were dead giveaways, and all I had to do to prove this was search with a key phrase from her submission and up popped her source. I did what I’d warned the class I would do: I printed out the offending passage, made a copy of her homework, and sent it to her parents to explain why she would be receiving a 0.

 

 (If you’re not familiar with the IB program, it's a curriculum originally designed to provide uniform and credentialed instruction for students living in far-flung places. Our students’ exams – all in the form of essays – were scored not by us, but by IB examiners all around the world., thus guaranteeing uniformity of quality. As the IB coordinator, I would send our math exams to, perhaps, Brazil and our English ones to Cardiff, Wales, or biology to France.)

 

          I was also trained as an Advanced Placement teacher, another college-recognized honors program. Of the two, I’ve always thought IB to be the more rigorous. I’d seen some AP testing, and wondered how on earth you could test a student on literature using multiple choice questions. Where was the critical thinking, the shades of meaning only explained by essay?

          I wonder if students in the future will have the ability to write a thoughtful response themselves anymore. Perhaps soon the only way to determine if they’ve grasped the material will be through multiple choice. The horror. 

6 comments:

  1. I wonder now what kind of schooling my twin grand daughters will have, they are only three, but in two years technology will be that much further ahead.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On a bright note, our twin granddaughters (7) are limited to Sat and Sunday morning TV and their parents are scrupulous about not being on their phones when around them.

      Delete
  2. It's a different world today, and not for the better, I fear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First, I completely agree with you DJan. And then I try to comfort myself with the thought that everyone before us probably said the same thing.

      Delete
  3. The horror, yes. I agree with your concerns. Why exercise critical thinking if AI already knows everything?
    With our 3 kids, two did the AP program, and middle son did IB (I can't even remember why - I think it was because many of his friends were in IB, so he went that way). I would say IB was, overall, more rigorous.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for stopping by and I'd love to hear what you think.