No, my title isn’t in code. It’s a response to last week’s Boston Globe article by Simon Rabinovitch about the use of artificial intelligence in education.
I know I’ve written about this before,
but what I see for the future still bothers me. As teacher, I spent a hefty
amount of time trying to get my students to use their brains and as an English
teacher, their own words. I can’t even imagine how frustrating this task must
be now, with chatbots like ChatGpt and Claude available to assemble the words
for them.
I often taught honors classes, and in
my later teaching years in the International Baccalaureate Programme. One of my
students' assignments was to write a simple summary paragraph about a particular
piece of literature. One girl, rather than do it herself, copied something
word-for-word from online and submitted it as her own.
Of course, the vocabulary and style
were dead giveaways, and all I had to do to prove this was search with a key phrase from her
submission and up popped her source. I did what I’d warned the class I would
do: I printed out the offending passage, made a copy of her homework, and sent it
to her parents to explain why she would be receiving a 0.
(If you’re not familiar with the IB program,
it's a curriculum originally designed to provide uniform and credentialed
instruction for students living in far-flung places. Our students’ exams – all in
the form of essays – were scored not by us, but by IB examiners all around the
world., thus guaranteeing uniformity of quality. As the IB coordinator, I would
send our math exams to, perhaps, Brazil and our English ones to Cardiff, Wales,
or biology to France.)
I was also trained as an Advanced
Placement teacher, another college-recognized honors program. Of the two, I’ve
always thought IB to be the more rigorous. I’d seen some AP testing, and wondered
how on earth you could test a student on literature using multiple choice
questions. Where was the critical thinking, the shades of meaning only
explained by essay?
I wonder if students in the future
will have the ability to write a thoughtful response themselves anymore.
Perhaps soon the only way to determine if they’ve grasped the material
will be through multiple choice. The horror.
I wonder now what kind of schooling my twin grand daughters will have, they are only three, but in two years technology will be that much further ahead.
ReplyDeleteOn a bright note, our twin granddaughters (7) are limited to Sat and Sunday morning TV and their parents are scrupulous about not being on their phones when around them.
DeleteIt's a different world today, and not for the better, I fear.
ReplyDeleteFirst, I completely agree with you DJan. And then I try to comfort myself with the thought that everyone before us probably said the same thing.
DeleteThe horror, yes. I agree with your concerns. Why exercise critical thinking if AI already knows everything?
ReplyDeleteWith our 3 kids, two did the AP program, and middle son did IB (I can't even remember why - I think it was because many of his friends were in IB, so he went that way). I would say IB was, overall, more rigorous.
Wow. You have some hard workers there.
Delete